[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"article:jlpt-n1-dokkai":3},{"meta":4,"markdown":79,"quiz":80},{"type":5,"articleId":6,"slug":7,"title":8,"titleEn":9,"category":10,"summary":11,"publishedAt":12,"image":13,"vocabulary":14,"quizId":78},"article","exam-jlpt-n1-dokkai","jlpt-n1-dokkai","JLPT N1 — 読解問題のアプローチ","JLPT N1 — A Strategic Approach to the Reading Section","exams","A strategy-first walkthrough of the JLPT N1 reading section. Covers all five\nquestion types (短文 \u002F 中文 \u002F 長文 \u002F 統合理解 \u002F 主張理解 \u002F 情報検索), suggested\ntime allocation, how to separate 主張 from 例, the 接続詞 patterns that mark\nlogical flow, and concrete tactics for the toughest 主張理解 long passage.\n","2026-04-27T00:00:00Z","https:\u002F\u002Fimages.yamiyomi.com\u002Fexam-jlpt-n1-dokkai.png",[15,20,24,29,34,38,42,46,50,54,58,62,66,70,74],{"word":16,"reading":17,"meaning":18,"level":19},"読解","どっかい","reading comprehension","N2",{"word":21,"reading":22,"meaning":23,"level":19},"主張","しゅちょう","claim \u002F assertion",{"word":25,"reading":26,"meaning":27,"level":28},"例","れい","example","N4",{"word":30,"reading":31,"meaning":32,"level":33},"内容理解","ないようりかい","content comprehension","N1",{"word":35,"reading":36,"meaning":37,"level":33},"統合理解","とうごうりかい","integrative comprehension",{"word":39,"reading":40,"meaning":41,"level":33},"主張理解","しゅちょうりかい","claim comprehension",{"word":43,"reading":44,"meaning":45,"level":33},"情報検索","じょうほうけんさく","information search",{"word":47,"reading":48,"meaning":49,"level":33},"接続詞","せつぞくし","conjunction",{"word":51,"reading":52,"meaning":53,"level":33},"指示語","しじご","demonstrative \u002F referent",{"word":55,"reading":56,"meaning":57,"level":19},"段落","だんらく","paragraph",{"word":59,"reading":60,"meaning":61,"level":33},"抽象","ちゅうしょう","abstract",{"word":63,"reading":64,"meaning":65,"level":33},"具体","ぐたい","concrete",{"word":67,"reading":68,"meaning":69,"level":33},"論旨","ろんし","gist of argument",{"word":71,"reading":72,"meaning":73,"level":33},"反論","はんろん","counterargument",{"word":75,"reading":76,"meaning":77,"level":33},"譲歩","じょうほ","concession","exam-jlpt-n1-dokkai-quiz","\n::heading\n[N1読解]{えぬいちどっかい::N3}は[時間]{じかん::N5}との[戦]{たたか::N3}い\n\n#en\nN1 reading is a battle against the clock\n::\n\n::para\n[JLPT N1]{じぇいえるぴーてぃーえぬいち:JLPT N1}の[読解]{どっかい:reading:N3}は[受験者]{じゅけんしゃ:test takers:N3}の[多]{おお::N4}くが[「最後]{さいご:end:N3}まで[解]{と::N3}き[終]{お::N4}わらない」と[感]{かん::N3}じる[セクション]{せくしょん:section}です。[文章量]{ぶんしょうりょう:text volume:N2}が[多]{おお::N4}く、[抽象度]{ちゅうしょうど:abstraction level:N1}も[高]{たか::N5}い[評論]{ひょうろん:editorial:N1}・[随筆]{ずいひつ:essay:N1}が[中心]{ちゅうしん:center:N4}で、[語彙]{ごい:vocabulary:N1}と[文法]{ぶんぽう:grammar:N3}の[知識]{ちしき:knowledge:N3}があっても[時間配分]{じかんはいぶん:time allocation:N3}と[読解戦略]{どっかいせんりゃく:reading strategy:N2}を[誤]{あやま::N3}ると[得点]{とくてん:score:N3}が[伸]{の::N2}びにくいと[言]{い::N4}われています。\n\n#en\nThe N1 reading section is the part most takers feel they cannot finish. Editorials and essays of high volume and abstraction dominate, and even with sufficient vocabulary and grammar, scores tend to stagnate when time allocation and reading strategy go wrong.\n::\n\n::para\n[本記事]{ほんきじ:this article:N3}では[N1読解]{えぬいちどっかい:N1 reading:N3}の[出題形式]{しゅつだいけいしき:question types:N3}を[整理]{せいり:organize:N1}した[上]{うえ:on top:N5}で、[時間配分]{じかんはいぶん:time allocation:N3}と[各形式]{かくけいしき:each format:N2}の[攻略法]{こうりゃくほう:strategy:N1}、[論理展開]{ろんりてんかい:logical flow:N1}を[素早]{すばや::N1}く[把握]{はあく:grasp:N1}するための[接続詞]{せつぞくし:conjunctions:N2}・[指示語]{しじご:demonstratives:N3}の[使]{つか::N4}い[方]{かた::N4}を[紹介]{しょうかい:introduce:N2}します。\n\n#en\nThis article first organizes the N1 reading question types, then introduces time allocation, per-format tactics, and how to use conjunctions and demonstratives to grasp logical flow quickly.\n::\n\n::heading\n[出題形式]{しゅつだいけいしき::N3}の[全体像]{ぜんたいぞう::N2}\n\n#en\nOverall structure of the question types\n::\n\n::para\n[N1読解]{えぬいちどっかい::N3}は[6つ]{むっつ:six}の[大問]{だいもん:major sections:N4}で[構成]{こうせい:composed:N3}されているとされます。[内容理解]{ないようりかい:content comprehension:N3}が[短文]{たんぶん:short:N2}・[中文]{ちゅうぶん:medium:N4}・[長文]{ちょうぶん:long:N4}の[三段階]{さんだんかい:three tiers:N2}、[加]{くわ::N3}えて[統合理解]{とうごうりかい:integrative comprehension:N1}、[主張理解]{しゅちょうりかい:claim comprehension:N1}、[情報検索]{じょうほうけんさく:information search:N1}の[計]{けい:total:N4}[6種類]{ろくしゅるい:six types:N3}です。[出題数]{しゅつだいすう:question count:N3}や[配点]{はいてん:point allocation:N3}は[公式]{こうしき:official:N3}には[公開]{こうかい:publicly disclosed:N4}されていませんが、[市販]{しはん:commercial:N2}の[模試]{もし:practice tests:N1}を[基]{もと::N1}にすると[読解]{どっかい:reading:N3}は[全体]{ぜんたい:total:N3}[60点]{ろくじゅってん:60 points:N3}[満点]{まんてん:full marks:N3}と[考]{かんが::N4}えられています。\n\n#en\nN1 reading is composed of six major sections: content comprehension at three tiers (short, medium, long), plus integrative, claim, and information search — six types in total. Question counts and point weights are not officially disclosed, but reading is generally treated as a 60-point section based on commercial practice tests.\n::\n\n::callout\n[6つ]{むっつ}の[出題形式]{しゅつだいけいしき::N3}：\n1. [短文]{たんぶん:short text:N2}（[200字]{にひゃくじ:200 chars:N4}[程度]{ていど:about:N3}×4-5問）\n2. [中文]{ちゅうぶん:medium text:N4}（[500字]{ごひゃくじ::N4}[程度]{ていど::N3}×3問）\n3. [長文]{ちょうぶん:long text:N4}（[1,000字]{せんじ::N4}[程度]{ていど::N3}×1問・[3-4設問]{さんよんせつもん::N2}）\n4. [統合理解]{とうごうりかい:integrative:N1}（[2つ]{ふたつ}の[文章]{ぶんしょう::N2}を[比較]{ひかく:compare:N1}）\n5. [主張理解]{しゅちょうりかい:claim:N1}（[長文]{ちょうぶん::N4}・[筆者]{ひっしゃ::N2}の[主張]{しゅちょう::N1}を[捉]{とら::N1}える）\n6. [情報検索]{じょうほうけんさく:information search:N1}（[広告]{こうこく:ads:N3}・[案内]{あんない:notices:N1}から[情報]{じょうほう::N3}を[抽出]{ちゅうしゅつ:extract:N1}）\n\n#en\n1. Short (~200 chars × 4–5 q)  2. Medium (~500 chars × 3 q)  3. Long (~1,000 chars × 1 passage, 3–4 q)  4. Integrative (compare two texts)  5. Claim (long text, identify author's claim)  6. Information search (extract info from ads\u002Fnotices).\n::\n\n::heading\n[時間配分]{じかんはいぶん::N3} — [110分]{ひゃくじゅっぷん::N5}の[使]{つか::N4}い[方]{かた::N4}\n\n#en\nTime allocation — how to use the 110 minutes\n::\n\n::para\n[N1]{えぬいち}の[言語知識]{げんごちしき:language knowledge:N3}＋[読解]{どっかい:reading:N3}は[合計]{ごうけい:combined:N3}[110分]{ひゃくじゅっぷん:110 minutes:N5}です。[語彙]{ごい:vocabulary:N1}・[文法]{ぶんぽう:grammar:N3}に[35〜40分]{さんじゅうごよんじゅっぷん:35–40 minutes:N5}を[使]{つか::N4}うとすると、[読解]{どっかい:reading:N3}に[70〜75分]{ななじゅうしちじゅうごふん:70–75 minutes:N5}を[残]{のこ::N3}せる[計算]{けいさん:calculation:N2}になります。[一般的]{いっぱんてき:generally:N2}な[配分例]{はいぶんれい:allocation example:N3}として、[短文]{たんぶん:short:N2}は[1問]{いちもん:per question:N4}[3分]{さんぷん:3 min:N5}、[中文]{ちゅうぶん:medium:N4}は[10分]{じゅっぷん:10 min:N5}、[長文]{ちょうぶん:long:N4}は[15分]{じゅうごふん:15 min:N5}、[統合]{とうごう:integrative:N1}は[10分]{じゅっぷん::N5}、[主張]{しゅちょう:claim:N1}は[15分]{じゅうごふん::N5}、[情報検索]{じょうほうけんさく:info search:N1}は[5分]{ごふん:5 min:N5}が[目安]{めやす:rough guide:N4}とされます。\n\n#en\nN1 language knowledge + reading is 110 minutes total. Allocating 35–40 minutes to vocabulary\u002Fgrammar leaves 70–75 minutes for reading. As one common allocation: short 3 min\u002Fq, medium 10 min, long 15 min, integrative 10 min, claim 15 min, information search 5 min.\n::\n\n::callout\n[時間配分]{じかんはいぶん::N3}の[考]{かんが::N4}え[方]{かた::N4}：[配点]{はいてん:point weight:N3}が[未公開]{みこうかい:undisclosed:N3}でも[長文]{ちょうぶん:long passage:N4}1[問]{もん::N4}で[複数]{ふくすう:multiple:N2}[設問]{せつもん:questions:N2}があるため、[長文]{ちょうぶん::N4}を[捨]{す::N2}てると[失点]{しってん:point loss:N3}が[大]{おお::N5}きいと[考]{かんが::N4}えられます。[逆]{ぎゃく::N2}に[情報検索]{じょうほうけんさく::N1}は[時間効率]{じかんこうりつ:time efficiency:N1}が[最]{もっと::N3}も[高]{たか::N5}いため、[最初]{さいしょ:first:N3}か[最後]{さいご:last:N3}に[確実]{かくじつ:reliably:N3}に[取]{と::N3}り[切]{き::N4}る[戦略]{せんりゃく:strategy:N2}が[推奨]{すいしょう:recommended:N1}されています。\n\n#en\nReasoning: even though weights are undisclosed, a long passage carries multiple questions, so abandoning it likely costs many points. Conversely, information search has the highest time efficiency, so a strategy of locking it down first or last is generally recommended.\n::\n\n::heading\n[内容理解 短文]{ないようりかい たんぶん::N2}の[攻略]{こうりゃく::N1}\n\n#en\nStrategy for short passage content comprehension\n::\n\n::para\n[短文]{たんぶん:short text:N2}は[200字]{にひゃくじ:200 chars:N4}[程度]{ていど::N3}の[随筆]{ずいひつ:essay:N1}・[エッセイ]{えっせい}・[ビジネス文書]{びじねすぶんしょ:business documents:N4}が[題材]{だいざい:topics:N2}になります。[設問]{せつもん:question:N2}は[1問]{いちもん:one question:N4}のみで、[筆者]{ひっしゃ:author:N2}が[最]{もっと::N3}も[言]{い::N4}いたいことや[特定箇所]{とくていかしょ:specific section:N1}の[意味]{いみ:meaning:N4}を[問]{と::N4}う[形式]{けいしき:format:N3}が[多]{おお::N4}いです。[全文]{ぜんぶん:all text:N3}を[精読]{せいどく:close-read:N3}する[時間]{じかん:time:N5}があるため、[結論部]{けつろんぶ:conclusion section:N1}（[多]{おお::N4}くは[最後]{さいご:last:N3}の[1〜2文]{いちにぶん::N4}）を[特]{とく::N4}に[注意深]{ちゅういぶか::N3}く[読]{よ::N5}むと[正答率]{せいとうりつ:accuracy rate:N1}が[上]{あ::N5}がると[考]{かんが::N4}えられます。\n\n#en\nShort texts are ~200-character essays, columns, or business documents. Each comes with one question, often asking what the author most wants to say or the meaning of a specific section. Since you have time to close-read the entire passage, paying special attention to the conclusion section (often the last 1–2 sentences) likely raises accuracy.\n::\n\n::heading\n[内容理解 中文]{ないようりかい ちゅうぶん::N3}の[攻略]{こうりゃく::N1}\n\n#en\nStrategy for medium passage content comprehension\n::\n\n::para\n[中文]{ちゅうぶん:medium text:N4}は[500字]{ごひゃくじ:500 chars:N4}[程度]{ていど::N3}で[1篇]{いっぺん:one passage:N1}に[3問]{さんもん:three questions:N4}が[付]{つ::N3}くのが[標準]{ひょうじゅん:standard:N1}です。[3問]{さんもん:three questions:N4}は[多]{おお::N4}くの[場合]{ばあい:case:N3}「[下線部]{かせんぶ:underlined section:N2}の[意味]{いみ:meaning:N4}」「[筆者]{ひっしゃ:author:N2}の[考]{かんが::N4}え」「[全体]{ぜんたい:overall:N3}の[論旨]{ろんし:gist:N1}」を[順]{じゅん:order:N2}に[聞]{き::N5}く[構成]{こうせい:structure:N3}とされます。[設問]{せつもん:questions:N2}を[先]{さき::N5}に[読]{よ::N5}み、[該当箇所]{がいとうかしょ:relevant section:N1}に[線]{せん:line:N2}を[引]{ひ::N3}きながら[読]{よ::N5}み[進]{すす::N3}めると[戻]{もど::N3}り[読]{よ::N5}みが[減]{へ::N2}ると[期待]{きたい:expect:N3}できます。\n\n#en\nMedium texts are ~500 characters with 3 questions per passage as standard. The three questions typically ask, in order, about the meaning of an underlined section, the author's view, and the overall gist. Reading the questions first and underlining relevant sections as you go can be expected to reduce backtracking.\n::\n\n::heading\n[内容理解 長文]{ないようりかい ちょうぶん::N3}の[攻略]{こうりゃく::N1}\n\n#en\nStrategy for long passage content comprehension\n::\n\n::para\n[長文]{ちょうぶん:long text:N4}は[1,000字]{せんじ:1,000 chars:N4}[程度]{ていど::N3}で[3〜4設問]{さんよんせつもん:3–4 questions:N2}が[付]{つ::N3}く[最]{もっと::N3}も[配点]{はいてん:point weight:N3}が[大]{おお::N5}きいと[推測]{すいそく:inferred:N1}される[形式]{けいしき:format:N3}です。[題材]{だいざい:topics:N2}は[評論]{ひょうろん:editorial:N1}・[随筆]{ずいひつ:essay:N1}・[科学]{かがく:science:N3}・[文化論]{ぶんかろん:cultural commentary:N3}が[多]{おお::N4}く、[読]{よ::N5}むだけで[10分]{じゅっぷん:10 min:N5}、[設問対応]{せつもんたいおう:question handling:N1}に[5分]{ごふん::N5}と[計算]{けいさん:calculate:N2}しておくと[安全]{あんぜん:safe:N3}です。\n\n#en\nLong texts run ~1,000 characters with 3–4 questions and are inferred to carry the heaviest weight. Topics are often editorials, essays, science, or cultural commentary. Budgeting 10 minutes to read and 5 minutes to answer is a safe estimate.\n::\n\n::callout\n[長文]{ちょうぶん::N4}の[読解手順]{どっかいてじゅん:reading procedure:N2}：\n1. [タイトル]{たいとる:title}と[第一段落]{だいいちだんらく:first paragraph:N1}で[テーマ]{てーま:theme}を[把握]{はあく:grasp:N1}\n2. [各段落]{かくだんらく:each paragraph:N2}の[最初]{さいしょ:first:N3}か[最後]{さいご:last:N3}の[1文]{いちぶん::N4}に[線]{せん::N2}を[引]{ひ::N3}く（[トピック文]{とぴっくぶん:topic sentence:N4}が[多]{おお::N4}い）\n3. [接続詞]{せつぞくし:conjunctions:N2}（しかし・つまり・ところが）に[印]{しるし::N2}を[付]{つ::N3}ける\n4. [最終段落]{さいしゅうだんらく:final paragraph:N3}で[結論]{けつろん:conclusion:N1}を[確認]{かくにん:confirm:N3}\n5. [設問]{せつもん:questions:N2}を[読]{よ::N5}んで[該当箇所]{がいとうかしょ:relevant section:N1}に[戻]{もど::N3}る\n\n#en\nLong passage procedure: (1) grasp the theme from title + first paragraph; (2) underline the first or last sentence of each paragraph (often a topic sentence); (3) mark conjunctions (shikashi, tsumari, tokoroga); (4) confirm the conclusion in the final paragraph; (5) read the questions and return to the relevant sections.\n::\n\n::heading\n[統合理解]{とうごうりかい::N1} — [二つ]{ふたつ::N5}の[文章]{ぶんしょう::N2}を[比較]{ひかく::N1}する\n\n#en\nIntegrative comprehension — comparing two passages\n::\n\n::para\n[統合理解]{とうごうりかい::N1}では[同]{おな::N4}じ[テーマ]{てーま:theme}に[対]{たい::N3}する[二つ]{ふたつ:two:N5}の[異]{こと::N1}なる[文章]{ぶんしょう:passages:N2}（A・B）が[提示]{ていじ:presented:N1}されます。[設問]{せつもん:questions:N2}は[「両者]{りょうしゃ:both:N3}に[共通]{きょうつう:common:N3}する[考]{かんが::N4}え」や[「両者]{りょうしゃ::N3}の[違]{ちが::N3}い」を[問]{と::N4}う[形式]{けいしき:format:N3}が[中心]{ちゅうしん:center:N4}です。[最初]{さいしょ:first:N3}に[両者]{りょうしゃ::N3}の[共通点]{きょうつうてん:common points:N3}と[相違点]{そういてん:differences:N3}を[簡単]{かんたん:briefly:N2}にメモすると[正答]{せいとう:correct answer:N4}を[絞]{しぼ::N1}り[込]{こ::N3}みやすいと[されています]{:said to be}。\n\n#en\nIntegrative comprehension presents two different passages (A and B) on the same theme. Questions typically ask about common ideas or differences between the two. Briefly noting common points and differences first is said to make narrowing the correct answer easier.\n::\n\n::callout\n[統合理解]{とうごうりかい::N1}で[役立]{やくだ::N3}つメモ[術]{じゅつ:technique:N3}：\n- A[筆者]{ひっしゃ:author:N2}の[立場]{たちば:stance:N4}：賛成／反対／中立\n- B[筆者]{ひっしゃ::N2}の[立場]{たちば::N4}：賛成／反対／中立\n- [共通点]{きょうつうてん::N3}：（[1〜2行]{いちにぎょう:1–2 lines:N5}）\n- [相違点]{そういてん::N3}：（[1〜2行]{いちにぎょう::N5}）\n\n#en\nUseful note template: A author's stance (for\u002Fagainst\u002Fneutral); B author's stance; common points (1–2 lines); differences (1–2 lines).\n::\n\n::heading\n[主張理解]{しゅちょうりかい::N1} — [N1最難関]{えぬいちさいなんかん::N3}\n\n#en\nClaim comprehension — the toughest N1 section\n::\n\n::para\n[主張理解]{しゅちょうりかい:claim comprehension:N1}は[最]{もっと::N3}も[抽象度]{ちゅうしょうど:abstraction:N1}が[高]{たか::N5}く、[1,000字超]{せんじちょう:over 1,000 chars:N2}の[評論]{ひょうろん:editorial:N1}や[論説]{ろんせつ:argumentative essay:N3}を[読]{よ::N5}んで[筆者]{ひっしゃ:author:N2}の[根本主張]{こんぽんしゅちょう:fundamental claim:N1}を[捉]{とら::N1}える[形式]{けいしき:format:N3}です。[難]{むずか::N3}しい[理由]{りゆう:reason:N3}は[「主張]{しゅちょう::N1}と[例]{れい:example:N3}の[区別]{くべつ:distinction:N2}」で、[筆者]{ひっしゃ::N2}が[反対意見]{はんたいいけん:opposing view:N3}を[紹介]{しょうかい:introduce:N2}してから[反論]{はんろん:counter:N3}する[「譲歩]{じょうほ:concession:N1}＋[逆接]{ぎゃくせつ:contrast:N2}」の[構造]{こうぞう:structure:N2}を[見抜]{みぬ::N3}く[必要]{ひつよう:necessity:N3}があるとされます。\n\n#en\nClaim comprehension is the most abstract — you read editorials or argumentative essays over 1,000 characters and identify the author's fundamental claim. The difficulty lies in distinguishing claim from example: you need to see through the \"concession + contrast\" structure where the author first presents an opposing view and then counter-argues.\n::\n\n::callout\n[主張理解]{しゅちょうりかい::N1}の[キーパターン]{きーぱたーん:key patterns}：\n- 「[たしかに]{:certainly}〜」→[次]{つぎ::N3}に「しかし／だが／とはいえ」が[来]{く::N5}る → [後者]{こうしゃ:latter:N4}が[筆者]{ひっしゃ::N2}の[主張]{しゅちょう::N1}\n- 「[一見]{いっけん:at first glance:N5}〜」→[逆接]{ぎゃくせつ:contrast:N2}が[来]{く::N5}る\n- 「〜[というのは]{:that is to say}」→[直前]{ちょくぜん:immediately preceding:N3}の[抽象表現]{ちゅうしょうひょうげん:abstract expression:N1}を[具体化]{ぐたいか:concretize:N3}している\n- [筆者]{ひっしゃ::N2}の[主張]{しゅちょう::N1}は[最終段落]{さいしゅうだんらく:final paragraph:N3}の[「だから]{:so}〜[ではないだろうか]{:isn't it…}」に[現]{あらわ::N3}れることが[多]{おお::N4}い\n\n#en\nKey patterns: \"tashika ni…\" followed by \"shikashi\u002Fdaga\u002Fto wa ie\" → the latter is the author's claim. \"Ikken…\" → contrast follows. \"~to iu no wa\" → concretizing the preceding abstract expression. The author's claim often appears in the final paragraph as \"dakara…dewa nai darou ka.\"\n::\n\n::heading\n[情報検索]{じょうほうけんさく::N1} — [得点源]{とくてんげん::N1}を[逃]{のが::N3}さない\n\n#en\nInformation search — don't miss this point source\n::\n\n::para\n[情報検索]{じょうほうけんさく:information search:N1}は[広告]{こうこく:advertisement:N3}・[案内文]{あんないぶん:notice:N1}・[時刻表]{じこくひょう:timetable:N3}などの[実用文書]{じつようぶんしょ:practical documents:N3}から[条件]{じょうけん:condition:N1}に[合]{あ::N3}う[情報]{じょうほう:information:N3}を[探]{さが::N3}し[出]{だ::N5}す[形式]{けいしき:format:N3}です。[全文精読]{ぜんぶんせいどく:close-reading the whole text:N3}は[不要]{ふよう:unneeded:N3}で、[設問]{せつもん:question:N2}の[条件]{じょうけん:conditions:N1}（[年齢]{ねんれい:age:N2}・[時期]{じき:period:N3}・[料金]{りょうきん:fee:N4}など）を[元]{もと::N4}に[該当箇所]{がいとうかしょ:matching section:N1}を[拾]{ひろ::N2}い[読]{よ::N5}みするのが[基本]{きほん:basic:N1}です。\n\n#en\nInformation search asks you to find information meeting given conditions in practical documents like ads, notices, and timetables. You don't need to close-read the whole text — the basic approach is to skim for sections that meet the question's conditions (age, period, fee, etc.).\n::\n\n::callout\n[情報検索]{じょうほうけんさく::N1}の[手順]{てじゅん:procedure:N2}：\n1. [設問]{せつもん::N2}の[条件]{じょうけん::N1}を[マル囲]{まるかこ::N2}みする\n2. [本文]{ほんもん:text:N4}の[表]{ひょう:table:N3}・[箇条書]{かじょうが::N1}きを[縦読]{たてよ::N1}みする\n3. [注意書]{ちゅういが::N4}き（[※]{こめ}・[小]{ちい::N5}さい[文字]{もじ:characters:N4}・[「ただし」]{ただし:however}）を[必]{かなら::N3}ず[確認]{かくにん:confirm:N3}\n4. [複数条件]{ふくすうじょうけん:multiple conditions:N1}は[両方]{りょうほう:both:N3}を[満]{み::N3}たすか[確認]{かくにん::N3}\n\n#en\nProcedure: (1) circle the question's conditions; (2) scan tables and bullet lists vertically; (3) always check footnotes (asterisks, fine print, \"tadashi\"); (4) for multiple conditions, verify all are met.\n::\n\n::heading\n[論理展開]{ろんりてんかい::N1}を[追]{お::N3}う[接続詞]{せつぞくし::N2}カタログ\n\n#en\nConjunction catalog for tracking logical flow\n::\n\n::para\n[N1読解]{えぬいちどっかい:N1 reading:N3}で[論理展開]{ろんりてんかい:logical flow:N1}を[一瞬]{いっしゅん:instantly:N1}で[把握]{はあく:grasp:N1}するには[接続詞]{せつぞくし:conjunctions:N2}を[「機能]{きのう:function:N3}[別]{べつ::N4}」に[整理]{せいり:organize:N1}しておくのが[有効]{ゆうこう:effective:N2}とされます。[次]{つぎ::N3}の[6カテゴリー]{ろくかてごりー:six categories}を[頭]{あたま:head:N3}に[入]{い::N5}れておくと[読解速度]{どっかいそくど:reading speed:N3}が[体感]{たいかん:noticeably:N3}で[向上]{こうじょう:improve:N3}すると[考]{かんが::N4}えられます。\n\n#en\nTo grasp logical flow instantly in N1 reading, organizing conjunctions by function is generally effective. Keeping these six categories in mind likely makes a noticeable difference in reading speed.\n::\n\n::callout\n[6カテゴリー]{ろくかてごりー}の[接続詞]{せつぞくし::N2}：\n- [順接]{じゅんせつ:cause→effect:N2}：だから／したがって／その[結果]{けっか:result:N1}／そのため\n- [逆接]{ぎゃくせつ:contrast:N2}：しかし／だが／ところが／にもかかわらず\n- [追加]{ついか:addition:N3}：さらに／しかも／その[上]{うえ::N5}／[加]{くわ::N3}えて\n- [対比]{たいひ:contrast\u002Fcomparison:N2}：[一方]{いっぽう:on the other hand:N4}／[他方]{たほう:on the other side:N3}／[逆]{ぎゃく:conversely:N2}に\n- [例示]{れいじ:example:N3}：たとえば／[具体的]{ぐたいてき:concretely:N3}には／[いわば]{:so to speak}\n- [換言]{かんげん:rephrase:N2}：つまり／[要]{よう::N3}するに／[すなわち]{:namely}／[言]{い::N4}い[換]{か::N2}えれば\n\n#en\nSix categories: junsetsu (cause→effect): dakara, shitagatte, sono kekka, sono tame. Gyakusetsu (contrast): shikashi, daga, tokoro ga, ni mo kakawarazu. Tsuika (addition): sara ni, shikamo, sono ue, kuwaete. Taihi (comparison): ippou, tahou, gyaku ni. Reiji (example): tatoeba, gutaiteki ni wa, iwaba. Kangen (rephrase): tsumari, you suru ni, sunawachi, ii-kaereba.\n::\n\n::heading\n[模試]{もし::N1}と[過去問題集]{かこもんだいしゅう::N3}の[使]{つか::N4}い[方]{かた::N4}\n\n#en\nUsing practice tests and past-exam collections\n::\n\n::para\n[N1読解]{えぬいちどっかい::N3}の[力]{ちから:power:N4}は[1日]{いちにち:one day:N5}で[付]{つ::N3}くものではないため、[週]{しゅう:per week:N4}に[1〜2回]{いちにかい::N3}は[時間]{じかん:time:N5}を[計]{はか::N4}って[模試]{もし:practice test:N1}を[解]{と::N3}く[練習]{れんしゅう:practice:N2}が[効果的]{こうかてき:effective:N2}とされます。[解答後]{かいとうご:after answering:N3}は[正解]{せいかい:correct answer:N3}・[不正解]{ふせいかい:incorrect:N3}に[関]{かか::N3}わらず、[「なぜ]{:why}この[選択肢]{せんたくし:option:N1}は[誤]{まちが::N3}いか」を[1問]{いちもん:per question:N4}ずつ[言語化]{げんごか:verbalize:N3}する[作業]{さぎょう:work:N4}が[読解力]{どっかいりょく:reading ability:N3}の[底上]{そこあ::N2}げに[最]{もっと::N3}も[寄与]{きよ:contribute:N3}すると[考]{かんが::N4}えられています。\n\n#en\nN1 reading ability isn't built in a day — practicing 1–2 timed mock tests per week is generally effective. After answering, regardless of correctness, the work of verbalizing \"why this option is wrong\" question by question is generally thought to contribute most to overall reading ability.\n::\n\n::callout\n[本記事]{ほんきじ::N3}の[最後]{さいご::N3}に[N1読解]{えぬいちどっかい::N3}スタイルの[5問]{ごもん:five questions:N4}テストを[用意]{ようい::N4}しています。[筆者]{ひっしゃ::N2}の[主張]{しゅちょう::N1}を[正]{ただ::N4}しく[捉]{とら::N1}えられるか、[論理展開]{ろんりてんかい::N1}を[正]{ただ::N4}しく[追]{お::N3}えるかを[確認]{かくにん::N3}してみましょう。\n\n#en\nA five-question N1-style reading test is provided at the end. Use it to check whether you can correctly capture the author's claim and follow the logical flow.\n::\n",{"id":78,"title":81,"titleEn":82,"topicPath":10,"questions":83},"JLPT N1 読解スタイル確認テスト","JLPT N1 Reading-Style Check Test",[84,111,134,157,180],{"id":85,"articleId":6,"question":86,"options":89,"correctLabel":95,"explanation":106,"tags":109},"exam-jlpt-n1-dokkai-quiz-q01",{"en":87,"jp":88},"'Certainly AI streamlines work. However, it has not reached the point of fully replacing human creativity.' What is the author's claim?","「[確]{たし}かに[AI]{えーあい}は[作業]{さぎょう}を[効率化]{こうりつか}する。しかし、[人間]{にんげん}の[創造性]{そうぞうせい}を[完全]{かんぜん}に[置]{お}き[換]{か}えるには[至]{いた}っていない」筆者の主張は？",[90,94,98,102],{"label":91,"jp":92,"en":93},"ア","[AI]{えーあい}は[人間]{にんげん}の[創造性]{そうぞうせい}を[置]{お}き[換]{か}える","AI replaces human creativity",{"label":95,"jp":96,"en":97},"イ","[AI]{えーあい}は[創造性]{そうぞうせい}を[完全]{かんぜん}には[置]{お}き[換]{か}えていない","AI has not fully replaced creativity",{"label":99,"jp":100,"en":101},"ウ","[AI]{えーあい}は[作業効率化]{さぎょうこうりつか}に[向]{む}いていない","AI is unsuited to streamlining work",{"label":103,"jp":104,"en":105},"エ","[創造性]{そうぞうせい}は[効率化]{こうりつか}できる","Creativity can be streamlined",{"en":107,"jp":108},"'Tashika ni...shikashi...' is the typical concession + contrast pattern; the latter half is the author's claim.","「[たしかに]{:certainly}〜しかし〜」は[譲歩]{じょうほ:concession}＋[逆接]{ぎゃくせつ:contrast}の[典型]{てんけい:typical}パターンで、[後半]{こうはん:latter half}が[筆者]{ひっしゃ}の[主張]{しゅちょう}とされます。",[110],"claim-comprehension",{"id":112,"articleId":6,"question":113,"options":116,"correctLabel":99,"explanation":129,"tags":132},"exam-jlpt-n1-dokkai-quiz-q02",{"en":114,"jp":115},"What is the role of 'tsumari' in: 'Modern society is overflowing with information. Tsumari, the power of selection is being tested.'","[次]{つぎ}の[文]{ぶん}の「つまり」が示す[役割]{やくわり}は？「[現代社会]{げんだいしゃかい}は[情報]{じょうほう}に[溢]{あふ}れている。つまり、[取捨選択]{しゅしゃせんたく}の[力]{ちから}が[問]{と}われている」",[117,120,123,126],{"label":91,"jp":118,"en":119},"[逆接]{ぎゃくせつ}を[示]{しめ}す","indicates contrast",{"label":95,"jp":121,"en":122},"[追加]{ついか}を[示]{しめ}す","indicates addition",{"label":99,"jp":124,"en":125},"[換言]{かんげん}を[示]{しめ}す","indicates rephrasing",{"label":103,"jp":127,"en":128},"[例示]{れいじ}を[示]{しめ}す","indicates example",{"en":130,"jp":131},"'Tsumari' summarizes \u002F rephrases the preceding content — a 'kangen' (rephrase) conjunction.","「つまり」は[直前]{ちょくぜん}の[内容]{ないよう}を[要約]{ようやく:summarize}・[言]{い}い[換]{か}える[換言]{かんげん:rephrase}の[接続詞]{せつぞくし}です。",[133],"conjunctions",{"id":135,"articleId":6,"question":136,"options":139,"correctLabel":95,"explanation":152,"tags":155},"exam-jlpt-n1-dokkai-quiz-q03",{"en":137,"jp":138},"When tackling integrative comprehension, what should you do first?","[統合理解]{とうごうりかい}の[問題]{もんだい}に[取]{と}り[組]{く}む[際]{さい}、[最初]{さいしょ}にすべきことは？",[140,143,146,149],{"label":91,"jp":141,"en":142},"A・B[両方]{りょうほう}の[全文]{ぜんぶん}を[精読]{せいどく}する","Close-read both A and B in full",{"label":95,"jp":144,"en":145},"A・B[両者]{りょうしゃ}の[立場]{たちば}と[共通点]{きょうつうてん}・[相違点]{そういてん}をメモする","Note both authors' stances and the common\u002Fdifferent points",{"label":99,"jp":147,"en":148},"A[だけ]{:only}を[読]{よ}んで[答]{こた}える","Read only A and answer",{"label":103,"jp":150,"en":151},"[設問]{せつもん}の[選択肢]{せんたくし}を[暗記]{あんき}する","Memorize the answer choices",{"en":153,"jp":154},"Integrative comprehension centers on questions about commonalities\u002Fdifferences, so it is generally efficient to organize the two stances first.","[統合理解]{とうごうりかい}は[両者]{りょうしゃ}の[共通点]{きょうつうてん}・[相違点]{そういてん}を[問]{と}う[形式]{けいしき}が[中心]{ちゅうしん}のため、[最初]{さいしょ}に[両者]{りょうしゃ}の[立場]{たちば}を[整理]{せいり}するのが[効率的]{こうりつてき}とされます。",[156],"integrative",{"id":158,"articleId":6,"question":159,"options":162,"correctLabel":99,"explanation":175,"tags":178},"exam-jlpt-n1-dokkai-quiz-q04",{"en":160,"jp":161},"What is the most important element to watch for in information-search problems?","[情報検索]{じょうほうけんさく}の[問題]{もんだい}で[最]{もっと}も[注意]{ちゅうい}すべき[要素]{ようそ}は？",[163,166,169,172],{"label":91,"jp":164,"en":165},"[全文]{ぜんぶん}の[論旨]{ろんし}","the gist of the whole text",{"label":95,"jp":167,"en":168},"[筆者]{ひっしゃ}の[感情]{かんじょう}","the author's emotion",{"label":99,"jp":170,"en":171},"[注意書]{ちゅういが}き（[※]{こめ}・[「ただし」]{ただし}）","footnotes (asterisks, 'tadashi')",{"label":103,"jp":173,"en":174},"[文章]{ぶんしょう}の[長]{なが}さ","length of the text",{"en":176,"jp":177},"In information-search problems, footnotes that restrict conditions (asterisks, 'tadashi') often determine the correct answer.","[情報検索]{じょうほうけんさく}では[条件]{じょうけん}を[制限]{せいげん:restrict}する[注意書]{ちゅういが}き（[※]{こめ}・[「ただし」]{ただし:however}）が[正答]{せいとう}を[左右]{さゆう:determine}することが[多]{おお}いとされます。",[179],"info-search",{"id":181,"articleId":6,"question":182,"options":185,"correctLabel":99,"explanation":198,"tags":201},"exam-jlpt-n1-dokkai-quiz-q05",{"en":183,"jp":184},"As a rough guide, how much of the 110 minutes should be allocated to reading in N1?","[N1読解]{えぬいちどっかい}の[時間配分]{じかんはいぶん}として[110分]{ひゃくじゅっぷん}のうち[読解]{どっかい}に[充]{あ}てる[目安]{めやす}は？",[186,189,192,195],{"label":91,"jp":187,"en":188},"[30分]{さんじゅっぷん}","30 minutes",{"label":95,"jp":190,"en":191},"[50分]{ごじゅっぷん}","50 minutes",{"label":99,"jp":193,"en":194},"[70-75分]{ななじゅうしちじゅうごふん}","70–75 minutes",{"label":103,"jp":196,"en":197},"[110分全]{ひゃくじゅっぷんぜん}て","all 110 minutes",{"en":199,"jp":200},"A common allocation is 35–40 minutes for vocabulary\u002Fgrammar and 70–75 minutes for reading.","[語彙]{ごい}・[文法]{ぶんぽう}に[35-40分]{さんじゅうごよんじゅっぷん}、[読解]{どっかい}に[70-75分]{ななじゅうしちじゅうごふん}が[一般的]{いっぱんてき}な[配分例]{はいぶんれい}とされます。",[202],"time-strategy"]