[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"news:world-us-transgender-troops-court-ruling-2026-06-02":3},{"meta":4,"markdown":65,"quiz":66},{"type":5,"articleId":6,"slug":7,"title":8,"titleEn":9,"category":10,"summary":11,"publishedAt":12,"image":13,"vocabulary":14,"quizId":62,"source":63},"news","news-world-us-transgender-troops-court-ruling-2026-06-02","world-us-transgender-troops-court-ruling-2026-06-02","米控訴裁、現役トランス兵の除隊を当面停止","U.S. Appeals Court Blocks Removal of Current Transgender Troops for Now","world-politics","Reuters reported on June 1 that a U.S. appeals court let the Pentagon keep blocking new transgender enlistments for now but stopped it from removing current service members while the lawsuit continues. The court said ending an existing military career would create a greater hardship than delaying a new one, even as one judge dissented and argued courts should stay out of military decisions. The ruling keeps a major part of the Trump administration's policy in legal limbo and leaves the broader constitutional fight unresolved.\n","2026-06-02T00:00:00Z","https:\u002F\u002Fimages.yamiyomi.com\u002Fnews\u002Fworld-us-transgender-troops-court-ruling-2026-06-02.png",[15,20,25,29,33,37,41,45,50,54,58],{"word":16,"reading":17,"meaning":18,"level":19},"控訴裁判所","こうそさいばんしょ","appeals court","N1",{"word":21,"reading":22,"meaning":23,"level":24},"現役","げんえき","active-duty status","N2",{"word":26,"reading":27,"meaning":28,"level":19},"除隊","じょたい","discharge from the military",{"word":30,"reading":31,"meaning":32,"level":24},"入隊","にゅうたい","enlistment",{"word":34,"reading":35,"meaning":36,"level":19},"訴訟","そしょう","lawsuit",{"word":38,"reading":39,"meaning":40,"level":19},"違憲","いけん","unconstitutional",{"word":42,"reading":43,"meaning":44,"level":24},"差別","さべつ","discrimination",{"word":46,"reading":47,"meaning":48,"level":49},"憲法","けんぽう","constitution","N3",{"word":51,"reading":52,"meaning":53,"level":19},"国防総省","こくぼうそうしょう","Pentagon",{"word":55,"reading":56,"meaning":57,"level":24},"判事","はんじ","judge",{"word":59,"reading":60,"meaning":61,"level":49},"兵士","へいし","soldier; service member","news-world-us-transgender-troops-court-ruling-2026-06-02-quiz",{"url":64},"https:\u002F\u002Fm.investing.com\u002Fnews\u002Fworld-news\u002Fus-court-blocks-pentagon-from-removing-transgender-troops-for-now-4720085?ampMode=1","\n::heading\n[米国]{べいこく:United States:N3}[控訴裁判所]{こうそさいばんしょ:appeals court:N1}の[判断]{はんだん:ruling:N3}\n\n#en\nThe U.S. Appeals Court's Ruling\n::\n\n::para\n[ロイター]{ろいたー:Reuters}が[6月1日]{ろくがつついたち:June 1:N5}に[伝えた]{つたえた:reported:N3}ところによると、[米国]{べいこく:United States:N3}の[控訴裁判所]{こうそさいばんしょ:appeals court:N1}は、トランスジェンダーの[現役]{げんえき:active-duty:N3}[兵士]{へいし:service members:N1}を[国防総省]{こくぼうそうしょう:Pentagon:N2}が[除隊させる]{じょたいさせる:discharge:N1}ことを、[訴訟]{そしょう:lawsuit:N1}が[続く]{つづく:continue:N3}あいだ[止めた]{とめた:blocked:N4}。\n\n#en\nReuters reported on June 1 that a U.S. appeals court blocked the Pentagon from discharging current transgender service members while the lawsuit continues.\n::\n\n::para\nその[一方]{いっぽう:on the other hand:N4}で、[裁判所]{さいばんしょ:court:N1}は、トランスジェンダーの[人]{ひと:people:N5}が[新たに]{あらたに:newly:N4}[入隊する]{にゅうたいする:enlist:N1}ことを[当面]{とうめん:for now:N3}[認めない]{みとめない:not allow:N3} [政府方針]{せいふほうしん:government policy:N2}は[続けられる]{つづけられる:can continue:N3}と[示した]{しめした:indicated:N3}。\n\n#en\nAt the same time, the court indicated that the government's policy of blocking new transgender enlistments can remain in place for now.\n::\n\n::heading\n[裁判所]{さいばんしょ:court:N1}が[示した]{しめした:presented:N3} [理由]{りゆう:reason:N3}\n\n#en\nWhy the Court Split the Policy\n::\n\n::para\n[2対1]{にたいいち:two to one:N3}の[判断]{はんだん:ruling:N3}で、[裁判所]{さいばんしょ:court:N1}は2025年の[政策]{せいさく:policy:N1}が、[政治的]{せいじてき:political:N3}に[弱い]{よわい:vulnerable:N2} [集団]{しゅうだん:group:N2}を[傷つけたい]{きずつけたい:want to harm:N1}という[思い]{おもい:intent:N4}に[基づいた]{もとづいた:was based on:N1} [可能性]{かのうせい:possibility:N3}があると[述べた]{のべた:said:N2}。\n\n#en\nIn the 2-1 ruling, the court said the 2025 policy may have been motivated by a desire to harm a politically unpopular group.\n::\n\n::para\nウィルキンス[判事]{はんじ:judge:N3}は、[新しい]{あたらしい:new:N4}[仕事]{しごと:position:N4}の[開始]{かいし:start:N4}を[遅らせる]{おくらせる:delay:N3}ことより、すでにある[軍歴]{ぐんれき:military career:N2}を[終わらせる]{おわらせる:end:N4}ことのほうが、より[大きな]{おおきな:greater:N5}[不利益]{ふりえき:hardship:N1}だという[考え]{かんがえ:view:N4}を[示した]{しめした:expressed:N3}。\n\n#en\nJudge Wilkins said ending an existing military career would create a bigger hardship than delaying the start of a new one.\n::\n\n::para\nただし、ウォーカー[判事]{はんじ:judge:N3}は[反対意見]{はんたいいけん:dissent:N3}で、[軍]{ぐん:the military:N2}がだれを[受け入れる]{うけいれる:accept:N3}かは、[裁判所]{さいばんしょ:court:N1}に[決める]{きめる:decide:N3} [権限]{けんげん:authority:N3}も[専門性]{せんもんせい:expertise:N2}もないと[述べた]{のべた:said:N2}。\n\n#en\nJudge Walker dissented, saying courts do not have the authority or expertise to decide who the military may accept.\n::\n\n::heading\n[前段階]{ぜんだんかい:earlier stage:N2}の[裁判]{さいばん:case:N1}と[政権方針]{せいけんほうしん:administration policy:N2}\n\n#en\nThe Earlier Case and the Administration Policy\n::\n\n::para\n[今回]{こんかい:this time:N3}の[判断]{はんだん:ruling:N3}は、ワシントンの[連邦地裁]{れんぽうちさい:federal district court:N1}が2025年に[政策全体]{せいさくぜんたい:the entire policy:N1}を[差し止めた]{さしとめた:blocked:N3} [決定]{けってい:decision:N3}を[一部]{いちぶ:partly:N3}[維持した]{いじした:upheld:N1}かたちとされる。その[地裁]{ちさい:district court:N1}は、その[政策]{せいさく:policy:N1}が[性差別]{せいさべつ:sex discrimination:N3}にあたり、[憲法]{けんぽう:constitution:N1}の[平等保護]{びょうどうほご:equal protection:N1}にも[反する]{はんする:violate:N3} [可能性]{かのうせい:possibility:N3}があると[見た]{みた:viewed:N5}。\n\n#en\nThe decision was reported as partly upholding a 2025 ruling by a federal district court in Washington that had blocked the entire policy. That lower court saw possible sex discrimination and a possible violation of constitutional equal-protection guarantees.\n::\n\n::para\n[報道]{ほうどう:the report:N3}によると、トランプ[大統領]{だいとうりょう:president:N1}は2025年1月の[大統領令]{だいとうりょうれい:executive order:N1}で、トランスジェンダーの[アイデンティティー]{あいでんてぃてぃー:identity}は[兵士]{へいし:soldier:N1}に[求められる]{もとめられる:required:N3} [規律]{きりつ:discipline:N2}と[合わない]{あわない:conflict with:N3}と[主張した]{しゅちょうした:argued:N1}。ヘグセス[国防長官]{こくぼうちょうかん:defense secretary:N2}はその[後]{あと:afterward:N5}、その[命令]{めいれい:order:N2}を[実施した]{じっしした:implemented:N1}とされる。\n\n#en\nReuters said President Trump argued in a January 2025 executive order that a transgender identity conflicts with the discipline expected of soldiers, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth later implemented that order.\n::\n\n::heading\n[反応]{はんのう:reaction:N1}と[今後]{こんご:what comes next:N5}\n\n#en\nReaction and What Comes Next\n::\n\n::para\n[原告側]{げんこくがわ:the plaintiffs' side:N3}を[支える]{ささえる:support:N3}GLAD Lawのジェニファー・レビ[氏]{し:-san:N1}は、この[判断]{はんだん:ruling:N3}を[歓迎した]{かんげいした:welcomed:N1}。いままで[厳しい]{きびしい:strict:N1}[基準]{きじゅん:standards:N1}を[満たしてきた]{みたしてきた:have met:N3} [現役兵]{げんえきへい:active-duty troops:N2}を[守る]{まもる:protect:N3} [内容]{ないよう:content:N3}だと[述べた]{のべた:said:N2}と[報じられている]{ほうじられている:was reported:N3}。\n\n#en\nJennifer Levi of GLAD Law, which represents the plaintiffs, welcomed the ruling. Reuters said she described it as protection for current troops who had already met strict service standards.\n::\n\n::para\n[国防総省]{こくぼうそうしょう:Pentagon:N2}はすぐには[コメント]{こめんと:comment}していないと[伝えられた]{つたえられた:was reported:N3}。[報道]{ほうどう:the report:N3}では、この[政策]{せいさく:policy:N1}はトランプ[政権]{せいけん:administration:N3}がトランスジェンダーの[人々]{ひとびと:transgender people:N5}への[認識]{にんしき:recognition:N3}や[配慮]{はいりょ:accommodation:N1}を[広く]{ひろく:broadly:N4}[縮めようとする]{ちぢめようとする:try to reduce:N1} [動き]{うごき:effort:N4}の[一部]{いちぶ:part:N3}だとされた。\n\n#en\nThe Pentagon did not immediately comment, Reuters said. The report added that the policy is part of a broader administration effort to reduce recognition and accommodation for transgender people.\n::\n\n::callout\n[米軍]{べいぐん:U.S. military:N2}の[現役要員]{げんえきよういん:active-duty personnel:N3}はおよそ130[万人]{ひゃくさんじゅうまんにん:1.3 million people:N5}で、トランスジェンダーの[兵士]{へいし:service members:N1}は[数千人規模]{すうせんにんきぼ:in the low thousands:N1}と[当局]{とうきょく:officials:N3}が[見ている]{みている:estimate:N5}と[報じられた]{ほうじられた:was reported:N3}。この[訴訟]{そしょう:lawsuit:N1}の[結論]{けつろん:final outcome:N1}は、まだ[出ていない]{でていない:has not been reached:N5}。\n\n#en\nReuters said the U.S. military has about 1.3 million active-duty personnel and that officials estimate the number of transgender service members in the low thousands. The lawsuit itself is still unresolved.\n::\n\n::para\n[今回]{こんかい:this time:N3}の[判断]{はんだん:ruling:N3}で、[現在]{げんざい:current:N3}の[兵士]{へいし:service members:N1}をめぐる[保護]{ほご:protection:N1}は[続く]{つづく:continue:N3}が、[新規入隊]{しんきにゅうたい:new enlistment:N1}の[扱い]{あつかい:treatment:N1}はなお[厳しい]{きびしい:strict:N1}ままとなった。[法廷闘争]{ほうていとうそう:court fight:N1}は、しばらく[続く]{つづく:continue:N3}と[見られる]{みられる:is seen:N5}。\n\n#en\nThis ruling keeps protections in place for current service members, but the treatment of new enlistments remains restrictive. The legal fight appears likely to continue for some time.\n::\n",{"id":62,"title":67,"titleEn":68,"topicPath":5,"questions":69},"米控訴裁とトランス兵の判決クイズ","Quiz on the U.S. Appeals Court and Transgender Troops",[70,97,120,143,166],{"id":71,"articleId":6,"question":72,"options":75,"correctLabel":77,"explanation":92,"tags":95},"news-world-us-transgender-troops-court-ruling-2026-06-02-quiz-q01",{"en":73,"jp":74},"According to Reuters, what did the appeals court stop?","ロイターによると、控訴裁判所は何を止めたか。",[76,80,84,88],{"label":77,"jp":78,"en":79},"ア","現役のトランス兵の除隊","The discharge of current transgender troops",{"label":81,"jp":82,"en":83},"イ","新しい戦闘機の購入","The purchase of new fighter jets",{"label":85,"jp":86,"en":87},"ウ","国防総省の移転","The relocation of the Pentagon",{"label":89,"jp":90,"en":91},"エ","議会選挙の延期","The delay of congressional elections",{"en":93,"jp":94},"The article says the court blocked the discharge of current transgender service members while the lawsuit continues.","記事では、訴訟が続く間、現役のトランス兵を除隊させることを裁判所が止めたと説明した。",[96],"court",{"id":98,"articleId":6,"question":99,"options":102,"correctLabel":81,"explanation":115,"tags":118},"news-world-us-transgender-troops-court-ruling-2026-06-02-quiz-q02",{"en":100,"jp":101},"At the same time, what was allowed to continue for now?","その一方で、当面続けられるとされたのは何か。",[103,106,109,112],{"label":77,"jp":104,"en":105},"軍の海外派遣","Overseas troop deployments",{"label":81,"jp":107,"en":108},"新規のトランス入隊の禁止","The ban on new transgender enlistments",{"label":85,"jp":110,"en":111},"兵士の給料引き下げ","Cuts to soldiers' pay",{"label":89,"jp":113,"en":114},"徴兵制の再開","The return of conscription",{"en":116,"jp":117},"The court indicated that the government's block on new transgender enlistments could remain in force for now.","裁判所は、新しく入隊することを認めない政府方針は当面続けられると示した。",[119],"policy",{"id":121,"articleId":6,"question":122,"options":125,"correctLabel":81,"explanation":138,"tags":141},"news-world-us-transgender-troops-court-ruling-2026-06-02-quiz-q03",{"en":123,"jp":124},"What idea did the majority opinion emphasize?","多数意見で、どのような考えが示されたか。",[126,129,132,135],{"label":77,"jp":127,"en":128},"新しい訓練施設の必要性","The need for new training facilities",{"label":81,"jp":130,"en":131},"既存の軍歴を終わらせる方が不利益が大きいこと","That ending an existing military career is the greater hardship",{"label":85,"jp":133,"en":134},"軍の予算を半分にすること","That the military budget should be cut in half",{"label":89,"jp":136,"en":137},"全ての訴訟をすぐ終わらせること","That all lawsuits should end immediately",{"en":139,"jp":140},"Judge Wilkins said ending an existing military career would be a greater hardship.","ウィルキンス判事は、すでにある軍歴を終わらせる方が、より大きな不利益だと考えた。",[142],"hardship",{"id":144,"articleId":6,"question":145,"options":148,"correctLabel":77,"explanation":161,"tags":164},"news-world-us-transgender-troops-court-ruling-2026-06-02-quiz-q04",{"en":146,"jp":147},"What did the dissenting judge argue?","反対意見を出した判事は何を主張したか。",[149,152,155,158],{"label":77,"jp":150,"en":151},"裁判所には軍の受け入れ基準を決める権限も専門性もない","Courts lack the authority and expertise to decide military admission standards",{"label":81,"jp":153,"en":154},"裁判所は国防総省の一部だ","The court is part of the Pentagon",{"label":85,"jp":156,"en":157},"すべての兵士は再審査されるべきだ","All troops should be reviewed again",{"label":89,"jp":159,"en":160},"入隊希望者は議会が選ぶべきだ","Congress should choose who may enlist",{"en":162,"jp":163},"Judge Walker said courts should not decide who the military may accept.","ウォーカー判事は、だれを受け入れるかを裁判所が決めるべきではないと述べた。",[165],"dissent",{"id":167,"articleId":6,"question":168,"options":171,"correctLabel":85,"explanation":184,"tags":187},"news-world-us-transgender-troops-court-ruling-2026-06-02-quiz-q05",{"en":169,"jp":170},"According to the article, who implemented the policy?","記事によると、この政策を実施したのはだれか。",[172,175,178,181],{"label":77,"jp":173,"en":174},"連邦最高裁","The U.S. Supreme Court",{"label":81,"jp":176,"en":177},"ニューヨーク州知事","The governor of New York",{"label":85,"jp":179,"en":180},"ヘグセス国防長官","Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth",{"label":89,"jp":182,"en":183},"国連事務総長","The U.N. secretary-general",{"en":185,"jp":186},"The article says Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth implemented the policy after Trump's order.","記事では、トランプ大統領の命令を受けてヘグセス国防長官が政策を実施したとされた。",[188],"pentagon"]